AN INTERNET PUBLICATION OF KLAUS EQUIPMENT COMPANY - PITTSBURGH PENNSYLVANIA

VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 DECEMBER 2008


IN THIS ISSUE                                      

WASTE OIL REUSE CAN HELP BALANCE BOTTOM LINE

REDUCED ENERGY CONSUMPTION MEANS REDUCED GREENHOUSE GAS -

PART 1

JAY SAYS



WASTE OIL REUSE CAN HELP BALANCE BOTTOM LINE

As manufacturers look for every cost advantage they can find in a sluggish economy, they may want to consider recycling waste oil for heat or selling it to an authorized recycler.

"If there were not enough environmental reasons to resell or reuse oil already, there's absolutely no reason you should not be reclaiming your oil," insisted Abanaki Corp.'s Tom Hobson in a Nov. 4 press release. "The oil you can recycle from your own plant can be reused in an industrial heater or an authorized recycler will buy it from you."

For some time, Hobson and those in his Cleveland-based company have been encouraging plants to recognize the financial advantages of turning waste oil into profit. With an oil skimmer, a company can collect up to 200 gallons per hour of oil or grease from wastewater. "Oil skimming cost-effectively reclaims oil from wastewater, and as heating bills climb during the winter, they can save energy costs by burning it," Hobson said. "In fact, burning spent oil in the proper furnace can often deliver a higher Btu [British thermal unit] value than new oil."

Since used oil usually has a thicker viscosity, it possesses more energy than #2 fuel oil and more than twice the energy value of LP gas or coal. Waste oils that can be burned for heat include almost any oil up to 50 S.A.E.: metal-cutting oils, lube oil, crankcase oil, transmission and hydraulic fluid, #1 and #2 diesel fuel, vegetable oils, and grease.

"The EPA supports the burning of used oil on site," Hobson explained, "because it prevents oil from entering the watershed and eliminates the risk of spills during transportation."

Those considering reselling their waste oil can turn to authorized recyclers such as David Charlton, chief executive officer of Akron-based Rice Environmental Services (RES), a 15-year veteran in the collection and recycling of used oils, as well as anti-freeze and oil filters, from commercial and industrial businesses.

"It comes down to this — one, you can sell the clean, dry used oil or, two, you can recycle it," said Charlton, whose company is part of the National Oil Recyclers Association (NORA). Established in 1985, NORA promotes "the primary mission of fighting the hazardous waste designation of used oil and [has] aided in the development of the EPA's used oil management standards."

"We're completely on board to remove oil from water," said Charlton, who pointed out that The Rice Companies not only recycle but also sell industrial and automotive lubricants. "It not just about reusing and recycling. It's about rethinking how things are done. It's the higher goal of sustainability."

Two years ago, an Abanaki-sponsored survey showed 78 percent of respondents were searching for ways to cut plant costs. Thirty-five percent said they would consider burning waste oils. Only eight percent said that their plants already burned waste oil for heat.

Environmental Protection (http://www.eponline.com)

 



REDUCED ENERGY CONSUMPTION MEANS REDUCED GREENHOUSE GAS - Part 1

Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change, and Energy

What Are Greenhouse Gases?

Many chemical compounds found in the Earth’s atmosphere act as “greenhouse gases.” These gases allow sunlight to enter the atmosphere freely. When sunlight strikes the Earth’s surface, some of it is re-radiated back towards space as infrared radiation (heat). Greenhouse gases absorb this infrared radiation and trap the heat in the atmosphere. Many gases exhibit these “greenhouse” properties. Some of them occur in nature (water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide), while others are exclusively human made (certain industrial gases). Over time, if atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases remain relatively stable, the amount of energy sent from the sun to the Earth’s surface should be about the same as the amount of energy radiated back into space, leaving the temperature of the Earth’s surface roughly constant.

Why Are Atmospheric Levels Increasing?
Levels of several important greenhouse gases have increased by about 25 percent since large-scale industrialization began around 150 years ago (Figure 1). During the past 20 years, about three-quarters of anthropogenic (human-caused) emissions came from the burning of fossil fuels. Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are naturally regulated by numerous processes collectively known as the “carbon cycle” (Figure 2).

Figure 1.Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Carbon Dioxide
Concentrations (1751-2004)


 

The movement (“flux”) of carbon between the atmosphere and the land and oceans is dominated by natural processes, such as plant photosynthesis. While these natural processes can absorb some of the net 6.2 billion metric tons (7.2 billion metric tons less 1 billion metric tons of sinks) of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions produced each year (measured in carbon equivalent terms), an estimated 4.1 billion metric tons are added to the atmosphere annually. This positive imbalance between greenhouse gas emissions and absorption results in the continuing increase in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases.

Figure 2. Global Carbon Cycle (Billion Metric Tons Carbon)

What Effect Do Greenhouse Gases Have on Climate Change?
In computer-based models, rising concentrations of greenhouse gases produce an increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures may, in turn, produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as “climate change.”

Assessments by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) suggest that the Earth’s climate has warmed between 0.6 and 0.9 degrees Celsius over the past century and that human activity affecting the atmosphere is “very likely” an important driving factor.1 The IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report (Summary for Policymakers) states, “Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.” It goes on to state, “The observed widespread warming of the atmosphere and ocean, together with ice mass loss, support the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely that global climate change of the past 50 years can be explained without external forcing, and very likely that it is not due to known natural causes alone.”

1
According to the IPCC “very likely” indicates that there is a 90 percent chance that this is the case.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/pdf/appk.pdf

 

 



EPA Pushes Ahead on GHG Standards

by Roy Bigham

Posted: December 23, 2010
The EPA issued its plan for establishing greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution standards under the Clean Air Act in 2011. The agency looked at a number of sectors and is moving forward on GHG standards for fossil fuel power plants and petroleum refineries – two of the largest industrial sources, representing nearly 40 percent of the GHG pollution in the United States. The schedule issued in the Dec. 23, 2010 agreements provides a clear path forward for these sectors and is part of EPA’s common-sense approach to addressing GHGs from the largest industrial pollution sources.

"We are following through on our commitment to proceed in a measured and careful way to reduce GHG pollution that threatens the health and welfare of Americans, and contributes to climate change," said Administrator Lisa Jackson. "These standards will help American companies attract private investment to the clean energy upgrades that make our companies more competitive and create good jobs here at home."

Several states, local governments and environmental organizations sued the EPA over the agency’s failure to update the pollution standards for fossil fuel power plants and petroleum refineries, two of the largest source categories of GHG pollution in the United States. Under today’s agreement, the EPA will
propose standards
for power plants in July 2011 and for refineries in December 2011 and will issue final standards in May 2012 and November 2012, respectively.

This schedule will allow the agency to host listening sessions with the business community, states and other stakeholders in early 2011, well before the rulemaking process begins, as well as to solicit additional feedback during the routine notice and comment period. Together this feedback will lead to smart, cost-effective and protective standards that reflect the latest and best information.

The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to set industry-specific standards for new sources that emit significant quantities of harmful pollutants. These standards, called New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), set the level of pollution new facilities may emit and address air pollution from existing facilities. The Act allows flexible and innovative approaches that take into account cost, health and environmental impacts, and energy requirements. The agency also must periodically update these standards to reflect improvements in control technologies.

Earlier this year, the EPA issued a common-sense approach to GHG permitting for the largest industrial sources. This approach, the GHG permitting guidelines issued in November, and these standards will give power plants and refineries a clear and sensible path for addressing GHG pollution.

The EPA will accept public comment on these two agreements for 30 days following publication of notice in the
Federal Register.
www.pollutionengineering.com

JAY SAYS

Dear Reader,

THE economy continues to slow down and the stock market has lost significant value. Many industries remain strong in spite of this turmoil. Our business orders have continued, and appear to be coming from energy related areas of the economy.

The need to reduce fuel consumption and expenses is on-going. Each company must make a decision to REDUCE EXPENSES BY REDUCING EXPERIENCED STAFF OR FIND NEW WAYS TO REDUCE ENERGY COSTS TO STAY PROFITABLE. Many businesses do not have a method to reduce energy costs, so the only course of action is to cut labor costs and lose valuable experienced employees.

Klaus Equipment Company offers a Process Audit to determine existing energy wastes. This is a wiser option to reduce operation expenses.

Best Regards,

Jay Klaus

Klaus Equipment Company

jklaus@klausequipment.com



Klaus Equipment Company
Phone: 724-444-3420
Fax: 724-444-3425
2866 West Bardonner Road,
Gibsonia, PA   15044


EmissionSolutions
Newsletter

CO2 smokstack emission

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

 

Visit KEC Website